 |
 |
 |
|
Waiting For Tommy XXXII
By Richard Johnston |
RICHARD:
Only before they were called Vertigo. In many ways, and probably
without your consent, you've been seen as a flag bearer for
New Marvel. However, your successful stylistic storytelling
skills (say that after five pints), while eminently suitable
for much of your pre-Marvel writing, is a burden to Spider-Man
and Daredevil. While a new (and stable) older readership has
been found, that's now stabilised and is off-putting to younger
readers, the future readers of the medium. In an earlier Waiting
For Tommy, Bill Jemas stated that the Ultimate books weren't
for younger kids, as they have sometimes been promoted. In
Daredevil, the eponymous character rarely appears in costume
(save for the promotional 25 cent issue) - this again fights
against the appeal of the character to potential younger readers.
Equally it can be argued that your fine crime fiction writing
skills are diluted by what superhero stylistic aspects still
remain in the comic. The books have fallen between stools,
and while may be popular in contrast with the rest of the
market, are stymieing the titles from ever reaching the mass
appeal they once did. Again, your take?

ULTIMATE
SPIDER-MAN SPECIAL #1 |
BRIAN:
My first instinct is to point out how successful the
books are as my argument that my storytelling techniques
are not a burden, but I find even typing the words to
be douchy.
See - I don't agree with your flimsy premises on any
level. So much so that I am sending you back to your
desk to work up a better question, this premise is SOOOOO
flimsy and your statements are false.
Genres are meant to be busted. They're meant to be eaten
and spit up. You know it, and I do believe you love
it. |
And no
one uses this 'New Marvel' term. No one. Five guys online.
Come
on, Rich, you got my attention, you can do better...
RICHARD:
This is starting to remind me of a certain conversation with
Joe Quesada. Whether I love it or not, is irrelevant here.
I buy more New Marvel books than I ever bought Old Marvel
- and that's not a term of abuse for either. I think it's
the recognition that Joe Quesada's regime is a sea change
for the company.
BRIAN:
I totally agree.
RICHARD:
But should I really be the target market for Marvel?
BRIAN:
You say on one end that these books should be for everyone
and then question why they appeal to you?
RICHARD:
I do. I think that these books have been written for a tighter
audience, including me, using characters that should have
a more universal appeal - which I was already catered for
by the likes of Top Shelf, Fantagraphics.
BRIAN:
Top Shelf, yes, Oni, yes. Fantagraphics needs a blood transfusion.
It's 1984 there everyday.
RICHARD:
But what about the 'me' of twenty-five years ago, picking
up the Fantastic
Four for the first time? When they books were all selling
in the hundreds and thousands for a start...
BRIAN:
I don't live in your shoes Rich, even though I would watch
your reality show, so I can't say. You'd think you'd be happier
that something appealed to you. USM has kids buying it, I
meet them every week. Daredevil squares older, always has,
so did the movie, Alias and Powers
are adult books.
RICHARD:
Okay then.. why did you feel that in the 25c issue, Daredevil
had to be in costume in action so much, when in the issues
before and after, he didn't?
BRIAN:
That is sooo not true, first off, though he isn't in costume
as often as classic superhero stories would have him, he is
in costume.
You do
know that the book is ABOUT him not being able to get in costume
without seriously threatening his entire life. I think that's
pretty clear.
He was
in costume in the issue before and after by the way, so eat
me :)
But I
wrote the comic THEN Marvel decided to make it a 25 center.
so...
RICHARD:
The assumption is that that particular issue was pitched as
an introduction, to grab film goers and to give the new reader
as much 'Daredevil in costume' as possible.
BRIAN:
No. Like I said.
RICHARD:
Okay, but shouldn't that be the same for the title as a whole?
Isn't every issue an introduction for someone - or shouldn't
it be?
BRIAN:
Absolutely!!! I hand in every script with that in my head.
And a recap I write myself.
Because
also, any issue might be someone's last, and I write it with
that in my head as well.
Also,
I hate to say this braggy sh** but you are asking me to defend
myself, but sales are up and the trades are doing great. We
got raves in EW and USA Today, I mean, what else am I supposed
to do to convince you and those who share your opinion?
RICHARD:
Have you considered writing characters for the audiences they
were intended for? And writing different works for different,
more targeted, audiences without having to use all-ages-intended
characters? Like Powers? Even Frank Miller's Daredevil could
be happily read by most seven year olds - do you believe yours
can as well?
Um.
Doing
anything for Epic?
BRIAN:
Not this year.
Brian
Bendis's work can be found at www.jinxworld.com. Rich Johnston's
can be found at Lying
In The Gutters. May they both find fortune, good favour
and be safe from the wrath of John Byrne.
The
Waiting For Tommy Archive |
- WFT
Edition on October 13, 2004
- WFT
Edition on July 30, 2004
- WFT
Edition on June 23, 2004
- WFT
Edition on June 16, 2004
- WFT
Edition on June 9, 2004
- WFT
Edition on May 26, 2004
- WFT
Edition on May 5, 2004
- WFT
Edition on April 6, 2004
- WFT
Edition on March 31, 2004
- WFT
Edition on March 17, 2004
- WFT
Edition on March 10, 2004
- WFT
Edition on March 3, 2004
- WFT
Edition on February 25, 2004
- WFT
Edition on February 19, 2004
- WFT
Edition on February 12, 2004
- WFT
Edition on February 5, 2004
- WFT
Edition on January 28, 2004
- WFT
Edition on January 21, 2004
- WFT
Edition on January 14, 2004
- WFT
Edition on December 31, 2003
- WFT
Edition on December 24, 2003
- WFT
Edition on December 17, 2003
- WFT
Edition on December 10, 2003
- WFT
Edition on December 3, 2003
- WFT
Edition on November 26, 2003
- WFT
Edition on November 19, 2003
- WFT
Edition on November 12, 2003
- WFT
Edition on November 5, 2003
- WFT
Edition on October 30, 2003
- WFT
Edition on October 23, 2003
- WFT
Edition on October 16, 2003
- WFT
Edition on September 17, 2003
- WFT
Edition on September 3, 2003
- WFT
Edition on August 27, 2003
- WFT
Edition on August 20, 2003
- WFT
Edition on August 13, 2003
- WFT
Edition on August 6, 2003
- WFT
Edition on July 31, 2003
- WFT
Edition on July 24, 2003
- WFT
Edition on July 17, 2003
- WFT
Edition on July 10, 2003
|
- WFT
Edition on July 2, 2003
- WFT
Edition on June 25, 2003
- WFT
Edition on June 18, 2003
- WFT
Edition on June 11, 2003
- WFT
Edition on June 4, 2003
- WFT
Edition on May 28, 2003
- WFT
Edition on May 21, 2003
- WFT
Edition on May 14, 2003
- WFT
Edition on May 7, 2003
- WFT
Edition on April 30, 2003
- WFT
Edition on April 23, 2003
- WFT
Edition on April 9, 2003
- WFT
Edition on April 3, 2003
- WFT
Edition on March 26, 2003
- WFT
Edition on March 19, 2003
- WFT
Edition on March 12, 2003
- WFT
Edition on March 5, 2003
- WFT
Edition on February 26, 2003
- WFT
Edition on February 19, 2003
- WFT
Edition on February 12, 2003
- WFT
Edition on February 5, 2003
- WFT
Edition on January 29, 2003
- WFT
Edition on January 22, 2003
- WFT
Edition on January 15, 2003
- WFT
Edition on January 8, 2003
- WFT
Edition on January 1, 2003
- WFT
Edition on December 25, 2002
- WFT
Edition on December 17, 2002
- WFT
Edition on December 11, 2002
- WFT
Edition on December 4, 2002
- WFT
Edition on November 20, 2002
- WFT
Edition on November 13, 2002
- WFT
Edition on November 6, 2002
- WFT
Edition on October 30, 2002
- WFT
Edition on October 23, 2002
- WFT
Edition on October 16, 2002
- WFT
Edition on October 9,
2002
- WFT
Edition on October 2, 2002
- WFT
Edition on September 25 , 2002
- WFT
Edition on September 18 , 2002
- WFT
Edition on September 11 , 2002
- WFT
Edition on August 30, 2002
- WFT
Edition on August 23, 2002
- WFT
Edition on August 17, 2002
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|